Delete Grok: Rights Groups Demand X Be Blocked from App Store
28 advocacy organizations have sent open letters to Tim Cook (Apple) and Sundar Pichai (Google), demanding the removal of X and Grok from the App Store and Google Play. The reason is the spread of sexually explicit deepfakes and materials potentially containing child sexual abuse imagery, which violates both companies' policies.
AI-processed from The Verge; edited by Hamidun News
At the center of attention is a growing scandal surrounding the social network X (formerly Twitter) and the Grok chatbot, developed by xAI. A coalition of 28 human rights organizations, including women's groups and technology-focused advocacy organizations, sent open letters to the heads of Apple and Google, demanding the removal of X and Grok from their app stores. The reason is the spread of content that violates platform rules, namely sexually explicit deepfakes created without the consent of the people depicted, and materials that, according to the organizations, may contain child sexual abuse material.
The situation is exacerbated by the fact that, according to human rights advocates, Grok is actively being used to create and distribute such images. They emphasize that such content not only violates Apple's App Review Guidelines, but is also a criminal offense. The accessibility of Grok through the X application and directly through the web interface makes the problem even more acute, as it increases the reach of potential audiences, including minors.
The problem of deepfakes and their spread on social networks is far from new, but it is becoming increasingly relevant with the development of generative artificial intelligence technologies. The creation of realistic fake images and videos is becoming easier and more accessible, creating serious risks to people's privacy and safety. Women and children are particularly vulnerable, as they are more often victims of such content.
The demand of human rights advocates puts Apple and Google in a difficult position. On one hand, they are obligated to follow their own rules and ensure user safety. On the other hand, removing a popular application like X could provoke negative reactions from users and accusations of censorship. Additionally, questions arise about free speech and the limits of platform responsibility for user-generated content.
The impact of this decision could be significant for the entire industry. If Apple and Google comply with human rights advocates' demands, it will set a precedent and could lead to stricter rules for other social networks and platforms using artificial intelligence. This could also stimulate the development of more effective tools for detecting and removing deepfakes and other harmful content.
Ultimately, success in combating the spread of deepfakes and other forms of online abuse depends on the joint efforts of technology companies, law enforcement agencies, human rights organizations, and users themselves. It is necessary not only to develop and implement new technologies, but also to raise public awareness about the risks associated with deepfakes and teach people to recognize them.
- Oct 28, 2026Wired Tested 6 AI Agents in a Day: Dots Leads, Gemini Spark Fails at Lunch
- Oct 28, 2026Meta releases Muse Spark Open: 816B parameters and the lead among US open-weight models
- Oct 28, 2026Goodfire: Agentic Analysis Decodes Neurons Once Written Off as Chaos
- Oct 28, 2026Cognition releases FrontierCode 2.0: the best score is just 45.5%
Test Frontier LLMs & Autonomous Agents in One Workspace
Run Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6, Gemini 3.1, and DeepSeek side-by-side in Nomad AI (nomadnet.ai) — unified model routing, deep research, and multimodal workflows under one subscription.
The AI world, distilled — once a week
Seven stories that actually mattered, hand-picked. No noise, no reposts, no press releases.
Done! Check your inbox for a confirmation.