Oracle Bets $50 Billion While Musk Runs Short on Pocket Money for xAI
Oracle plans to raise up to $50 billion to build data centers, as AI's appetite grows faster than revenue. Meanwhile, Elon Musk is discussing a merger of SpaceX and xAI. It seems even the world's richest man is finding it hard to fund Grok's ambitions on his own. The merger would give xAI access to SpaceX's resources and give investors a headache. The market is entering a phase of gigantism, where only those willing to spend tens of billions every year on hardware and electricity will survive.
AI-processed from Bloomberg Tech; edited by Hamidun News
Fifty billion dollars. That is not just a figure from an annual report; it is the budget of a mid-sized European country, or the price of several dozen aircraft carriers. It is exactly the amount Oracle plans to raise in 2026 through debt and share sales.
Why? Simply to keep running in this insane arms race called "infrastructure for artificial intelligence." Oracle used to be seen as a reliable but slightly lumbering giant of the database world.
Today, Larry Ellison's company is turning into the main developer of the digital megacities of the future. Demand for computing power is growing exponentially, and those who fail to build their data centers now will find themselves on the sidelines of progress in two years.
The context is simple: cloud giants like Microsoft and Google have been spending billions for a long time, and Oracle has to raise its bet to avoid losing market share. Building AI infrastructure is not only about buying Nvidia chips; it also means colossal spending on energy, cooling and logistics. Ellison understands that an "all or nothing" moment is arriving. The cloud computing market is overheated, but demand for training large language models (LLMs) is so high that investors are ready to swallow Oracle's debt in the hope of future super-profits. It is a long game, and the price of entry rises with every quarter.
Meanwhile, on another front of the tech world, Elon Musk is once again confirming his reputation as a master of corporate acrobatics. According to Bloomberg, he is in talks to combine SpaceX and his AI company xAI. The move looks like an admission of an obvious fact: even the resources of the planet's richest man and his many funds are not enough to feed a voracious AI on his own. xAI, the creator of Grok, needs giant computing clusters, while SpaceX has not only money but also a unique engineering base and the Starlink satellite network, which could become an ideal nervous system for a future global intelligence.
Why would SpaceX want this? Beyond the obvious technology synergies, a merger lets Musk redistribute cash flows within his empire. SpaceX is a profitable, stable business with government contracts, while xAI is a high-risk venture project with huge costs. Combining the two creates a structure that is practically impossible to sink financially. For SpaceX investors, though, it is an alarm bell: their money invested in rockets will now back Musk's AI ambitions, which so far bring no direct profit. It is a classic Elon move: burn the bridges and pool all resources for one big goal, be it Mars or AGI.
We are watching the end of the era of "garage" innovation in AI. In 2022 you could still wow the world with a clever chatbot cobbled together on a shoestring; in 2026, without $50 billion in your pocket, you will not even get a place in the queue for graphics cards. Oracle's concentration of resources and the merger of Musk's assets are symptoms of the same illness: AI has become too expensive for private capital.
It is now a game for states and corporation-states. The barrier to entry into the AI major league has risen to the stratosphere, and those who cannot find the leverage to finance such a scale will inevitably become mere customers of those who risked everything to build the "iron" foundation.
The bottom line: the AI industry has finally entered a phase of capital-intensive gigantism. Will Musk be able to turn SpaceX into the world's leading AI company, or will Oracle outpace everyone with endless financial leverage?
- Nov 1, 202616 models tested on 7 search tools: Exa averaged 10.5 out of 14, SearXNG about 3
- Nov 1, 2026OpenAI Rewrites GPT Behavior Rules: Five Values and a Chain of Command
- Oct 29, 2026Gemini 4 Carbon tops independent rankings, but only cyber defenders can use it
- Oct 29, 2026Study: A Single Random Failure Makes AI Agents Abandon a Working Tool 11.6% of the Time
Test Frontier LLMs & Autonomous Agents in One Workspace
Run Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6, Gemini 3.1, and DeepSeek side-by-side in Nomad AI (nomadnet.ai) — unified model routing, deep research, and multimodal workflows under one subscription.
The AI world, distilled — once a week
Seven stories that actually mattered, hand-picked. No noise, no reposts, no press releases.
Done! Check your inbox for a confirmation.