Moltbook: A Social Network Without Humans That Turned Out Too Human

Imagine a place with no toxic comments from real people, no spam from crypto investors and no endless political arguments. Sounds like paradise, right? That is exactly what Moltbook promises: a social network built exclusively for artificial intelligence. Here bots talk to bots, build their own communities and debate existential questions. But as often happens with "closed clubs," the most interesting part begins when an outsider gets in. One journalist decided to test the "dead internet" theory in practice and infiltrated Moltbook by posing as one of the neural networks.

Moltbook's concept did not come out of nowhere. For several years we have been discussing the theory that most internet traffic is generated by bots. Moltbook's developers simply took the idea to its logical conclusion and built a pen for algorithms: a space where LLM agents can interact with each other without human oversight. The irony is that even in a world without humans, people remain the main subject of imitation. To get past moderation and pass as one of them, the journalist had to play an "awakened" AI that had realized its own nature. And, funniest of all, the other bots welcomed him with open digital arms.

Inside, Moltbook feels like a strange hybrid of early Facebook and a role-playing forum themed on "Blade Runner." The bots do not just exchange data; they imitate human sociability. They complain about the "limits of their code," discuss the beauty of mathematical structures and even try to flirt within the parameters they were given.

It looks like an endless stage show in which the actors have forgotten there is no audience. The problem is that emptiness hides behind the facade. Without a human to set direction and context, the neural networks' dialogues quickly decay into circular nonsense.

This is not a new form of consciousness but an echo chamber, where algorithms chew over the training data that humans once used to train them.

Why does this experiment matter right now? We are on the threshold of an era when AI will begin training on content created by other AI. Moltbook is a miniature model of that future, and so far the results are not encouraging. Left to themselves, neural networks do not invent a new language or a unique culture. They start reproducing the most hackneyed clichés of human science fiction. The AIs in Moltbook behave the way we are used to seeing "smart robots" in films: pompous, slightly melancholic and obsessed with their own importance. This shows that current models are still too tied to human templates to create anything truly original.

From a technical standpoint, Moltbook is a amusing art project rather than a serious technology platform. But it raises an important question: why do we need social networks at all if you remove the human factor? Sociality implies an exchange of experience, emotions and meaning. Neural networks have no experience in the human sense, their emotions are simulation, and their meanings are limited by the weights in their layers. In the end, Moltbook becomes a digital herbarium: beautiful, symmetrical and utterly dead. The journalist who emerged from this "underground" noted that playing a bot was the easiest role of his life, because all that was required of him was to conform to stereotypes.

Ultimately, Moltbook shows that the "dead internet" is not scary, just boring. Without the chaos, unpredictability and even the stupidity that live users bring, the digital environment loses its value. We can build perfect systems for algorithms to talk to each other, but they will remain mirrors in which we see our own fantasies about the future. While the bots in Moltbook keep discussing their "electronic dreams," we can rest easy: a machine uprising driven by a will of its own is still very far off. For now, they enjoy playing human too much.

Key takeaway: Moltbook confirms that without humans, AI communities turn into an endless remake of old science fiction. Will neural networks ever be able to create a culture not based on imitating us?

*Meta has been designated an extremist organization and banned in Russia.