Apple secretly threatened to pull Grok from the App Store over deepfakes on X
Apple secretly threatened to remove Grok from the App Store, according to a letter obtained by NBC News. In January, the company demanded that X and Grok present a plan to deal with the unwanted sexual deepfakes flooding the platform. The threat stayed behind closed doors, and Grok was never removed.
AI-processed from The Verge; edited by Hamidun News
In January 2026, Apple privately threatened to remove the AI app Grok from the App Store because the X platform was failing to contain a wave of unwanted sexual deepfakes. NBC News reported this, citing a private letter from Apple to US senators.
According to the letter, Apple contacted the X and Grok teams after receiving user complaints and seeing news coverage of the scandal. The company demanded that the developers "develop a plan to improve content moderation." The threat was stated plainly: without concrete measures, Grok risked leaving the app store.
The deepfake scandal erupted on X in late 2025 and early 2026, when users en masse posted AI-generated images that undress real people without their consent. The wave of content was so large that it drew public criticism of X and Grok, as well as of Apple and Google, for taking no visible action against apps that spread such material.
Notably, Apple acted quietly: the threat was made behind closed doors while public pressure on the company mounted. Critics pointed out that Apple, with enormous leverage as the owner of the App Store, was slow to respond publicly. In the end, Grok was never removed, at least as of the time of publication.
The story exposes a long-standing contradiction: the App Store is positioned as an environment with strict safety rules, yet Apple often applies real enforcement behind the scenes and inconsistently. When the stakes involve a platform with a audience of millions and the backing of one of the world's most influential entrepreneurs, even the biggest tech gatekeeper prefers to tread carefully.
The incident raises the question of how platforms and app stores should respond to systemic violations by major players, and whether they are ready to pay the political price for truly tough decisions.
- Nov 1, 202616 models tested on 7 search tools: Exa averaged 10.5 out of 14, SearXNG about 3
- Nov 1, 2026OpenAI Rewrites GPT Behavior Rules: Five Values and a Chain of Command
- Oct 29, 2026Gemini 4 Carbon tops independent rankings, but only cyber defenders can use it
- Oct 29, 2026Study: A Single Random Failure Makes AI Agents Abandon a Working Tool 11.6% of the Time
Test Frontier LLMs & Autonomous Agents in One Workspace
Run Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6, Gemini 3.1, and DeepSeek side-by-side in Nomad AI (nomadnet.ai) — unified model routing, deep research, and multimodal workflows under one subscription.
The AI world, distilled — once a week
Seven stories that actually mattered, hand-picked. No noise, no reposts, no press releases.
Done! Check your inbox for a confirmation.